Sermons

“The Miracle of Conviction"


   john blank


The miracle of conviction


Noel K. Anderson

First Presbyterian Church of Upland

Who likes a good courtroom drama? Classic movies like To Kill a Mockingbird, The Rainmaker, A Few Good Men—all convert the normally-dry proceedings of a trial to passions, emotions, and great surprise arguments to convict or otherwise convince a jury of the proper course of justice. 

Today’s text is such a drama—among the most fascinating dialogues in the Bible. Filled with passion, justice, and an abundance of irony, the exchange between a formerly-blind man and the Jewish leaders gives us a glimpse into the core difference between authentic faith and manufactured religion.  

A little background: at the start of chapter 9, Jesus’ disciples ask him why the man was born blind. Was it his sin or his parents that caused this? Jesus heals the blind man (without asking him) by making a mud pie and smearing on his eyes and then telling him to wash in the pool of Siloam. Once the man emerges healed, the people are amazed. The Jewish leaders hear about it and question him, but he doesn’t know anything—he doesn’t know, but he confirms that he was born blind but now can see. “What do you think of this guy?” they ask him, already convinced that he’s a sinner because he made the mudpie on the Sabbath, which they agreed was a sin. The man doesn’t guess but proclaims, “He IS a prophet!” meaning God sends him to do God’s will and work. 

That’s not what they wanted to hear, so they send for the man’s parents to be sure he really was blind from birth. Yes, they say, but they evade any other questions to keep out of trouble. “Ask him yourself, “ they say, “he’s no longer a minor and can speak for himself.” 

They call him in to question him the second time, and this is where our text begins: 

John 9: 24-34  New Revised Standard

24 So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and they said to him, “Give glory to God! We know that this man is a sinner.” 25 He answered, “I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.” 26 They said to him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?” 27 He answered them, “I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?” 28 Then they reviled him, saying, “You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. 29 We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.” 30 The man answered, “Here is an astonishing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes. 31 We know that God does not listen to sinners, but he does listen to one who worships him and obeys his will. 32 Never since the world began has it been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a person born blind. 33 If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.” 34 They answered him, “You were born entirely in sins, and are you trying to teach us?” And they drove him out..  †

Walk the text

Fascinating dialogue

24 So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and they said to him, “Give glory to God! We know that this man is a sinner.” 

The key verb in this dialogue is know. It is used magically—seven times in this passage. They say, “We know this man’s a sinner.” That is their conviction, so their only point in questioning the man is to confirm what they think they already know. It’s called confirmation bias—they know what they want to hear, and they ask this man to tell it to them. It’s the same reason conservatives like Tucker Carlson and progressives like Rachel Maddow—we’re going to hear what we want to hear—something to confirm our present bias. The Jewish leaders, like many Americans, don’t want to learn anything; they just want to be told they’re already right. 

But the man doesn’t play along:

25 He answered, “I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.” 

The Jewish leaders say, “We know,” but the man says, “I don’t know about that.” He is practical and straightforward. He has already told them he believes Jesus is a prophet—sent from God and doing God’s work—as if to say, “Any of you got a better explanation? Wanna share it with us all?”

26 They said to him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?” 27 He answered them, “I have told you already, and you would not listen.

Conviction, ltd.

Really knowing

Their convictions made them unteachable. And we need to talk about conviction here. We hear the word “know” as in “we know” in this passage seven times. The word is used emphatically, suggesting “we really know.” We all know there is a difference between knowing something and really knowing something, such as a foreign language. I can speak a few phrases of French and a little bit of Indonesian, so if you heard me, you might think I know those languages, but I assure you, I don’t really know them. 

Whether we know something slightly or well may be a matter of skill and practice, as with a language, but there is another kind of knowing—the kind that becomes a core belief—something you live by and may even fight or die for. That kind of knowing is called conviction. 

Conviction is a courtroom word. To secure a conviction means a person’s guilt or innocence of a matter has been more or less proved. The word convict has the same root as the word convince. To have a conviction is to feel totally convinced about something. 

The Jewish leaders want the blind man who now sees to convince them that they have been right all along about Jesus in saying he is a sinner, but the man is convinced that Jesus is doing God’s work. His conviction that Jesus is good supplies him with such strength in this encounter.

karmic law

Not for Christians

The man born blind lived his entire life under a cloud of suspicion that he deserved his horrible fate. Even the disciples ask, “Who sinned? The man or his parents?” because they couldn’t imagine someone suffering like this outside of some scheme of divine justice. 

In all the world’s religions—except Biblical faiths—the most common worldview about human suffering is Karmic Law or Karma. If bad things happen to you, it is probably your Karma working out. You did something awful in a former incarnation, or else you did something wicked in this life that demanded a balance of justice. It was a big part of Judaism as well. The Sadducees believed that human beings were responsible for their own fate. Wisdom or foolishness makes the difference between happiness and misery. Like Job’s so-called “friends,” they couldn’t believe that such awful things could befall a righteous man, therefore your miseries are evidence of your sin, so you probably should go ahead and curse God and die. Some friends. 

I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that many Christians secretly believe in Karma—that bad things happen to us because we’ve done something wrong. Our sins lead to unrelated incidents of misery, but that misery is nonetheless caused by our having sinned. Well, that’s nonsense, and Jesus says so early in the chapter. When the disciples ask him who sinned, Jesus says, 

“Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God’s works might be revealed in him.” [John 9: 3]

He was born blind for God’s ultimate glory, not because of sin—either his or his parents. Karma and Karmic Law are right out. Misery and evils done to us are mysteries, not cosmic justice playing out, as tempting as that may be to think. The blind man’s new boldness reveals that he gets this at a gut level. He won’t pull his punches.

Contrasts

Characters from opposite ends of the spectrum

Now consider the enormous character clash of these players. The man born blind likely would have lived on the streets and made his living by begging. He lived his life at the bottom rung of social status. Most of the community thought he was there because of sin, so social oppression would have been his norm. Meanwhile, the Jewish leaders are at the very top—they have wealth, high status, and a robust support network. They are the in-crowd—the righteous in-crowd. The blind man may have had some caring parents and kind neighbors, but he is otherwise alone. They are highly-educated; he has lived on the streets. This contrast is significant because of what comes next. Continuing verse 27: 

“Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?”

Is he turning the knife in the wound? “You already had me here, and I told you my story, so why would you have me back? Oh, I know—you must be seeking to follow him as well! Oh, how great would that be! All of Israel’s leadership lining up behind the one who speaks with real authority—the one with the power of God to heal! He could heal this rotten and corrupted Temple as well, couldn’t he? That would be a great thing for all Jews, now wouldn’t it?” 

Despite the temptation to think he’s being just sassy or defiant—getting his digs in at a world that rejected him—I don’t think he’s being a smart aleck. I think he is genuinely taken with Jesus—he’s a true believer—and can’t help but marvel at the hope and possibility suggested by the idea that Pharisees and Sadducees might follow Christ as well. It would be wonderful—an end to the class divisions and political corruption of Jerusalem. Much like the good-hearted Christians today who might put a “Jesus for President” bumper sticker on their car, I expect this comes from a positive sentiment rather than a rebellious one. Either way, he exhibits extraordinary confidence. He has gained more than his eyesight through his encounter with Jesus; he has gained conviction as a witness to Christ. Yet he does arouse their ire. Verses 28-29: 

 Then they reviled him, saying, “You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.”

sources

Not all conviction is good conviction

We know! they say. Our convictions land us with Moses, but we do not know where this guy comes from!   If only they did! In what are their convictions based? God did reveal himself to Israel—to Abraham, the Patriarchs, and Moses—two-thousand years before this drama. What is the foundation of their convictions? There are several possibilities:

1. TRADITION—like Fiddler on the Roof in all the best ways.

2. NATIONAL IDENTITY—We are God’s People! (It is about US preserving US)

3. POWER—We got a good thing going and don’t need anyone rocking the boat.

4. DIVINE REVELATION—“God told us Himself.” 

The problem with tradition is that it amounts to, “I believe it because my grandmother believed it!”—not really a good foundation for conviction at all. As for national identity, that’s just tribal pride—there’s no real virtue in it. To hold a conviction “because it empowers me” only reduces truth claims to a kind of survivalism. It has nothing to do with truth, just usefulness to yourself. Divine revelation is the correct foundation for conviction, but as we see in our story, it is impossible to translate to others unless God should throw that switch in the minds of others. 

The blind man who sees has true conviction. Touched by Christ, he courageously speaks of Jesus to the leaders of his world. Notice how marvelous he sounds—even elegant—from verse 30: 

“Here is an astonishing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes. We know that God does not listen to sinners, but he does listen to one who worships him and obeys his will. Never since the world began has it been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a person born blind. If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.” 

Who is teaching whom? Who sounds like he has the degree from Harvard Law School now? Who is the teacher and who are the taught? They can’t answer him, but they answer anyway—verse 34: 

“You were born entirely in sins, and are you trying to teach us?” And they drove him out.

It is so obvious that they have lost that all they can do is revert to their lame, former position: But you’re a big sinner!—and then eject him from their clubhouse. It’s the kind of thing you say when you’ve lost, and you know it, but you have to do whatever is necessary to preserve your power. It is the death of authentic faith and conviction.

The Holy Spirit

Faith is a gift, not an opinion

In the New Testament, the chief role of the Holy Spirit is to convince and convict—remember; it’s the same word. Why didn’t the pious and believing Jewish leaders accept that Jesus was their Messiah? Why does one person believe and another not believe? Two identical twins sit side-by-side, listening to the same Gospel message. They have the same social background and essentially the same biological makeup, but one hears and says, “Ah! This is the truth—I am convinced!” and the other says, “I just don’t get it.” 

We may be able to talk people into the wrong kinds of conviction—we can convince them that tradition is worth preserving, or that their group identity and sense of self is more important than their individual thoughts and needs, or that by holding certain opinions, they are more likely to thrive and flourish in this world with greater personal empowerment. Still, only God’s Holy Spirit can throw that spiritual switch moving one from disbelief to authentic faith. 

Every conversion is a miracle—a miracle of conviction. Some would say that the other miraculous thing about this text is the miracle of disbelief—how could they not see that Jesus was the promised one—the one they awaited and prayed for? 

God is sovereign: he opens hearts, and he hardens hearts. We can’t be too hard on people who say they don’t believe. Faith is a gift, not an opinion. 

Our witness to Christ in this world does not depend on our being high-minded or clever. We don’t have to be aggressive or anxious in our outreach. We can do no good unless the Spirit works through us. Therefore, all we need to be is humble and obedient. God puts us where he wants us. What we need to be is ready to serve at any moment—willing and compliant—not armed to the teeth with memorized Bible verses or sophisticated arguments to unmake atheism. 

All conviction—either ours or that of loved ones we would reach—must flow from the Holy Spirit, or it is not worth our time and effort. Let us seek to submit and subject ourselves in every day to the work of the Holy Spirit within and among us. Let us bring him our blindness, deafness, ineptitude, and inadequacies in order that he make us what he wants of us. Let us bring our sin forward as a gift offering, in order that we may be healed by his grace and made useful in his kingdom.


Questions

  1. Who is the blind man and why are the Pharisees questioning him?
  2. Does he know Jesus? And what is his answer to the Pharisees? Vs.25
  3. What are some of the fears we have in speaking clearly regarding our beliefs about Jesus?
  4. What is the argument the blind man uses to defend that Jesus is from God?  (vs.30-33)
  5. Why did the Pharisees throw him out of the synagogue?
  6. Why did the man believe finally, while the Pharisees remained unbelieving?
  7. How does it feel sometimes when others reject your simple statement of your belief?

“Glory Missed"


   john blank


glory missed


Noel K. Anderson

First Presbyterian Church of Upland

Last week, we saw Jesus teaching in the Temple during the Feast of Booths, celebrating how God led the people in the wilderness by being their light, bread, and living water. Jesus reveals himself as the giver of bread, the light of the world, and the living water of eternal life, but the Scribes and Pharisees want him killed as a blasphemer. They can’t quite manage to pin him down. 

This week, we’re talking about Death, Blasphemy, and Glory—which should have been my title. 

Chapter 8 begins with the famous story of the woman caught in adultery. The Scribes and Pharisees try to trap Jesus into having her stoned to death, but Jesus—the true judge—shows her mercy. 

Today, he is teaching in the Temple again, and he makes clear that those who do not believe in him can’t possibly say they know or love the Father and again proclaims their essential unity. Our text picks up there. 

Text: John 8: 48-59  New Revised Standard

48 The Jews answered him, “Are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?” 49 Jesus answered, “I do not have a demon; but I honor my Father, and you dishonor me. 50 Yet I do not seek my own glory; there is one who seeks it and he is the judge. 51 Very truly, I tell you, whoever keeps my word will never see death.” 52 The Jews said to him, “Now we know that you have a demon. Abraham died, and so did the prophets; yet you say, ‘Whoever keeps my word will never taste death.’ 53 Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died? The prophets also died. Who do you claim to be?” 54 Jesus answered, “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, he of whom you say, ‘He is our God,’ 55 though you do not know him. But I know him; if I would say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you. But I do know him and I keep his word. 56 Your ancestor Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day; he saw it and was glad.” 57 Then the Jews said to him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” 58 Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, before Abraham was, I am.” 59 So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.  †

DEATH

Was Jesus more Greek than Hebrew?

“Jesus, just a question: are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?” 

To call Jesus a Samaritan was to say he is an enemy of Israel, despite being a Jew. To say he has a demon is entirely rational from a worldly view. Jesus has said he can confer life on whomever he pleases, that God Almighty has given overall judgment to him, that he can forgive sins and a dozen other things that would make such a question reasonable. 

One of C. S. Lewis’s most famous quotes comes from his book Mere Christianity:

Jesus [. . .] told people that their sins were forgiven. [. . .] This makes sense only if He really was the God whose laws are broken and whose love is wounded in every sin. [. . .] I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: “I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.” 

That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.  - C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

Jesus says, “Of course not—but I honor my Father, and you dishonor me.” Which, by extension, means they dishonor God. They would have felt this was an offense immediately because they were “the righteous ones” of Israel. 

Jesus then raises the stakes—verse 51:

“Amen, Amen, I tell you, whoever keeps my word will never see death.” —John 8:51

At this, I imagine every jaw-dropping. What? Never see death? What does that even mean? They come at him: Look, Abraham and the Patriarchs all lived and died; the prophets all lived, all died; David, Solomon—all of them were human beings! They all lived, but they all died. How can you say, ‘Whoever keeps my word will never see death? Who do you think you are? Are you greater than Abraham? 

Jesus answers I’m not here to glorify myself. My Father glorifies me, and He is the one you dare to call your Lord and God, but you don’t really know him. I know him. If I said that I don’t really know him, I’d be a liar like all of you. 

They say, “You’re not a day over 40, and Abraham died 2200 years ago! How can you say you’ve seen him?” 

Of Abraham, Jesus says (v. 56)

 Your ancestor Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day; he saw it and was glad.

What are we to make of this? Does this mean that Abraham is not really dead? How can he be alive and observing the arrival of Christ 2200 years later? Jesus implies that Abraham is still looking on as he cheers on Jesus from his heavenly box seat. 

Orthodox Christian teaching says we are simply dead—or “asleep”—until the resurrection of the flesh. “Rest in Peace” is what we used to put on gravestones (according to the cartoons, anyway—though I’ve never seen one). We die in the hope of the resurrection when our physical bodies will be raised from the grave—as Christ’s was—and live a new life with an immortal body. But what are we to make of the in-between time? Abraham hasn’t yet been resurrected, has he? No, his bones lay somewhere underground in Old Hebron, as do the bones of all the patriarchs, prophets, apostles, saints, Christians, and atheists right up till today. So in what way is Abraham observing? Where are Peter and Paul right now? Where’s my mother and father—and my grandparents? 

There are many verses undermining that doctrine that sound much more like the pagan Greeks than the Hebrew Old Testament. 

Matthew 22: 31-32

 31 And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God, 32 ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is God not of the dead, but of the living.”

So those who have biologically died yet live in God’s realm? Apparently so. Also, remember what Jesus said to the thief beside him on the cross: 

Luke 23: 42-43

42 Then [the criminal] said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” 43 He replied, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”

That’s today, not someday, not Sunday, once I have been resurrected, or after the final trumpet at the resurrection of all flesh, but simply today

When we live to the Lord and keep his word, we never taste death, though we do and will experience biological death. There is no spiritual death for those who are in Jesus; he has already saved our souls for eternity. 

Jesus says in verse 58

“Amen, Amen, I tell you, before Abraham was, I AM.”

That I AM is the name of God the Father, and this is why they wanted to stone him. 



BLASPHEMY

Who is NOT guilty?

Our text from Leviticus lays down the law for blasphemy. Verse 16:

One who blasphemes the name of the Lord shall be put to death; the whole congregation shall stone the blasphemer. 

What is blasphemy? In short, it is trash-talking God. 

It is the opposite of glorifying him—giving him praise, honor, and thanks. 

Think of a polarity with blasphemy at one end and glorification of God on the other. 

Blasphemy is the opposite of the first and greatest commandment: 

‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ [Matthew 22:37]

Blasphemy is to do the opposite, but what is the opposite of love? The opposite of love isn’t necessarily hate, which would read, 

•One who hates The Lord with all his heart, soul, and mind.

•One who ignores The Lord with all his heart, soul, and mind.

•One who neglects The Lord with all his heart, soul, and mind.

Put simply, blasphemy is not to observe the first and greatest commandment. Anything other than loving God with our whole heart, soul, and mind amounts to blasphemy. 

Who is guilty of blasphemy—most of humanity, to be sure. 

Who is guilty of blasphemy in this passage?

The Jewish leaders are out to kill Jesus. That’s more than neglect or ignoring him. It is active hatred. They are going out of their way—to a great deal of work—to have him destroyed. Their blasphemy is willful and intentional defiance of God—as hateful as hatred can be.

Going back to their own law, all of them—the entire congregation—deserves to be stoned to death. 

But they are blind to their sin even as they are deluded about their own righteousness. This is all hypocrisy—found among churches, yes, but also in the secular world—mainly politics. And business. And entertainment. And the media, academia, education, the military—and we should probably face it: All humankind dabbles in blasphemy regularly and is all worthy of death because we fail to love God fully and give him his due glory. 

Which leads us to glory….

GLORY

Hint: It doesn’t come from us

Jesus says he does not seek his own glory but that of his Father, and his Father seeks to glorify him, the Son. 

So what, exactly, is glory? What do we mean by it? 

Glory is a shining light. In the Old Testament, the word for glory is Shekinah, something like radiance and light. Glory, in this sense, is the light that emanates out from God the way the light pours out of our sun. 

 Jesus has said, “I am the light of the world,” which means he is this world’s glory—God the Father has given all glory to his Son Jesus. 

Now “to glorify” can mean to shine a light upon something. You can’t add glory to the sun by pointing a flashlight at it. To glorify God might be thought of as shining a light upon God, which isn’t all bad as an idea but falls apart quickly because God is glory. 

There is an image for worship—we wrongly may think of ourselves as obligated to glorify God—to light him up in a dark world—to shine our lights upon him so that the world would see him, but this is more than a bit ridiculous. This is trying to point a flashlight at the sun. 

God is all glorious—the source of all glory in heaven and earth. We are foolish to think we can add to his glory or highlight it—we can’t. Far better than our measly little flashlights would be simple mirrors—one small mirror, by reflecting the light of the sun, can do more than any flashlight. 

We do not have glory to give God. We do not have light within us to add to his great light. No, at best, we receive his light and reflect it outward. We are not sources of light, but we can be conduits and reflectors of that light. 

We can’t give God glory because all glory comes from Him. He is glorious in and of himself; we either acknowledge—or fail to acknowledge—his glory.

The better definition of glory—as in glorifying God—is to say that we give God all honor, praise, and thanks. We acknowledge that God is all glorious—the source and substance of all glory. 

Question number one of the Westminster Shorter Catechism is something every Christian should have memorized. It is a question/answer format: 

Q: What is the chief end of Man? 

A: The chief end of Man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever. 


How do we glorify God? We acknowledge that he is the light from whom all light comes. He is the glory that outshines the cosmos. He is life before the life of the universe and after its end. He is eternal and eternally good. 

We glorify God by worshiping him. The Father is God; the Son Jesus is God; the Holy Spirit is God—one identity, one name, one I AM. 

“Before Abraham was, I AM,” said Jesus, and the religious leaders cried, “Blasphemy!” 


But for us, to say that Jesus is anything less than the whole life and Glory of God Almighty is the greater blasphemy. 

May all glory, praise, and honor be given to God—may we reflect his glory outward and proclaim his exceeding goodness, both now and forever!


Questions

  1. Where is Jesus and what is the context/setting of this discourse between the Pharisees and Jesus?
  2. Why do Jesus’ enemies accuse him of being a Samaritan and demon-possessed?
  3. What lies does the devil use today in the church to excuse destructive/violent action?
  4. What does it mean to never see death?  When does it begin? (See John 11:26)
  5. How does this make a difference in your life?
  6. Why are the rulers so provoked by Jesus?  See vs.52
  7. What does Jesus mean by “before Abraham was born I am”?
  8. Why would this be so difficult for the rulers to hear or understand?
  9. What are the difficulties in hearing and understanding Jesus’ words today?
  10. How can we as the Lord’s ambassadors help people to know who the Christ is?

“The Peril of Relevance"


   john blank


the peril of relevance


Noel K. Anderson

First Presbyterian Church of Upland

Text: John 7: 1-13  New Revised Standard

1 After this Jesus went about in Galilee. He did not wish to go about in Judea because the Jews were looking for an opportunity to kill him. 2 Now the Jewish festival of Booths was near. 3 So his brothers said to him, “Leave here and go to Judea so that your disciples also may see the works you are doing; 4 for no one who wants to be widely known acts in secret. If you do these things, show yourself to the world.” 5 (For not even his brothers believed in him.) 6 Jesus said to them, “My time has not yet come, but your time is always here. 7 The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify against it that its works are evil. 8 Go to the festival yourselves. I am not going to this festival, for my time has not yet fully come.” 9 After saying this, he remained in Galilee. 10 But after his brothers had gone to the festival, then he also went, not publicly but as it were in secret. 11 The Jews were looking for him at the festival and saying, “Where is he?” 12 And there was considerable complaining about him among the crowds. While some were saying, “He is a good man,” others were saying, “No, he is deceiving the crowd.” 13 Yet no one would speak openly about him for fear of the Jews.  †

atmosphere

Jesus in a Hostile World

Last week, we heard Jesus revealed as the Bread of Life, the bread that comes down from Heaven. As we move into chapters 7-8, Jesus operates under a cloud of conflict. There is no calm solemnity of private discourse or exposition of doctrine before a dignified body; instead, the air is thick and crowded with controversy. Jesus encounters people one by one, face to face, and the controversial tone is sharp and sustained. 

Jesus and his disciples are back in Capernaum, their home base in Galilee. But even at home, there is no comfort. There are, as it were, contracts out on Jesus’ life. People want him dead, and this atmosphere of darkness and hostility hangs like a dark cloud over everything that happens. The world hates Jesus and is out to have him canceled. 

We need not be surprised; the world is still a canceling, condemning place. We know this environment of conflict and hostility because we’re living it, albeit in a different form. 

Feast of Booths

Still Wandering in SINai

Passover may have been the most solemn and important of Jewish festivals, recalling the salvation of Israel from slavery in Egypt. Still, Sukkoth, the Feast of Booths, was the favorite festival. It is the harvest festival. The people remember the years of wandering in the wilderness and thank God for his care. They build humble dwellings—booths or tabernacles—attached to their homes. They take meals alfresco and camp outside in the cooling nights of October. The summer heat is past, and there is plenty of food to go around. 

This was Israel’s favorite party. We can understand this quickly enough. What Christian could dispute that Easter is the most important holiday of the year in terms of our faith and salvation, but is it our favorite? No--that’s Christmas by a long shot. Honestly, plenty of Christians enjoy Super Bowl Sunday more than Easter, right? 

We should see a level of irony in this particular Feast of Booths, for here is Israel, gathered in celebration of its own identity and heritage, remembering how their forbears wandered in the desert. The manna fell from heaven, and they thanked God, who led them by a pillar of fire and gave them water from the rock. The irony is that we see something they do not; namely, that they are still wandering lost in the wilderness—they’ve just turned it into a holiday. 

With bread on the outdoor table and cups filled with wine, they recollect the past: “Hey, look at us—we’re wandering in the wilderness!” It is still their spirit 1300 years later. They are still lost, wandering, and waiting for God to save them from their sins. 

By the way, the word Sin means wandering. To sin literally means to be lost, off the right path, wandering. The place where the Jews wandered is called the wilderness of Sin, which is in part where the word comes from. Today we call it Sinai. 

And so Israel celebrates its wandering—you could say it celebrates its sin. As such, Sukkoth—the Feast of Booths is a big Sin Pride Parade. They were lost, they grumbled and murmured, and would have voted to go back to Egypt ten times out of ten if anyone had asked.

Brotherly Advice

With Brothers like these….

So next, Jesus’ “brothers” tell him he’s wasting his time up here in Galilee. If he’s serious about success, he should go down to Jerusalem and make a name for himself. Who are these guys—these brothers? We’re not sure. They may have included half-brothers, cousins, or perhaps even uncles. It could be as broad as “male relatives,” but I think it may be something else; namely, the Jewish brethren of the Capernaum synagogue—a fraternity of fishermen—the Capernaum Board of Trustees. Whatever its exact composition, it was a force to be reckoned with. 

They think they know something about the world that Jesus doesn’t. They shower him with their advice: 

  • “You gotta network if you wanna get ahead!” 
  • “Get your name out there; get some exposure!” 
  • “You must get a website and flood the socials—TikTok is especially hot right now.”
  • “Really, Jesus, how can you be so amazing at teaching and healing and yet know absolutely nothing about success?” 
  • “Get yourself down to the Feast, man! You gotta market your brand!” 

Like a smarmy, Hollywood public relations firm, the brothers seem eager to help him, but as the text tells us, they didn’t get it. They misperceived him and his mission. They knew the worldly way of doing things, but not God’s way, which is a theme throughout John’s Gospel. 

Jesus says, “My time has not come, but your time is always here.” The time for Jesus’ self-revelation does not unfold according to worldly times and calendars, but only when the Father says so. Jesus continues in verse 7: 

The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify against it that its works are evil.

Jesus does not shrink from telling the world how messed up it is. It seems to me that this is part of the ongoing calling of the Church as well. We, too, continue to address a world that hates Jesus and doesn’t want to be told it is either wrong or sinful—wandering and lost without knowing the right path. 

John Calvin puts it this way: 

He means that the Gospel cannot be preached aright without summoning the whole world as guilty to the judgment seat of God.

Jesus doesn’t have to pick and choose who is righteous and who is not because the whole world is wandering, lost, and in Sin.

Timing matters

Jesus waits, but then goes

Jesus tells his brothers that he doesn’t intend to “work” this festival. “Go to the festival yourselves,” he says, which almost has the ring of “Mind your own business,” and well it should. 

He waits for them all to leave before he goes down to Jerusalem so he can do so on his own terms, rather than as they might expect him to do. I get this somewhat. I speak as a pastor (because I don’t know anything else), and sometimes I like to be in church as a mere worshiper. I can never do that in my own church, but when I’m on vacation or working out of town on a Sunday, I get to pop into other churches. Do I want people to know I’m a visiting pastor? Absolutely not! I’d get too much of the wrong kind of attention. I want to just check it out, get a feel for the lay of the land, and see how others do things and see what it feels like. 

Jesus wants to go to Jerusalem on his own terms for his own reasons, which is enough for us to know.

Jerusalem split

Jesus the Judge is the Divider of Humankind

The Jewish people were looking for him at the Festival. Why? Because there was every worldly reason that he would be there. He was thirty-ish, healthy, and the talk of the town throughout Israel. “Where is he?” the people asked. Some believed him to be the Messiah; others thought him a phony. Some want to make him king; others want him dead. He divides Israel, but then again, he is their true judge.

Division, discord, and hostility are in the air. What did Jesus do for people to be so against him? A quick reminder: 

  • He causes chaos and havoc by clearing the Temple
  • He says he has the same authority as God
  • He says he, the Son, and the Father God are as one
  • He claims to have authority to judge as God judges
  • He claims to have prophetic authority 
  • He claims more authority than Moses and the Law
  • He heals on the Sabbath
  • He claims to be able to give life to the dead
  • He calls himself the “Bread of Heaven” and the “Bread of Life”
  • And says salvation requires that we eat his flesh and drink his blood

And some would have said, “Do we really need to hear anything else?” 

Gathered in their booths as they feasted, they talked about Jesus, and Jesus divided them. Most beautifully, John tells us that they “grumbled and murmured” about him. They are exactly where they were 1300 years before—wandering in the wilderness, neither knowing nor following their Lord. 

In private, they spoke their true minds, but in public, they said nothing. Don’t we know this? Aren’t there things you might think or say at your own table or among your most trusted friends only but would never say aloud and certainly never put in print? I think we all do. 

Integrity pole

Integrity versus Harmony/Selling Out

Jesus, unlike his people, has integrity. Jesus has perfect integrity; the rest of us merely have our moments. We should think of integrity as a spectrum. At one end is integrity—standing up for the truth, unswervingly, without compromise or regard oneself, serving the greater good, and knowing that sometimes the crowd is wrong—and at the other end is (putting it positively) harmony—getting along with others, compromising, accommodating, being team players, etc. Integrity can be the opposite of harmony, but it is also the opposite of selling out. 

Old TestamentIsrael sinned whenever it compromised, and it seems their compromises always involved idol worship. 

“These Canaanites don’t know the Lord! They don’t know any better, so let’s just allow them to have some idols so we can get along and keep the conversation going.” This becomes, “Yeah, we have idols in our house—they were gifts from the Canaanites—but we think the Lord is above such things; He doesn’t really care about such things.”  

It was multiculturally sensitive, diversity-positive, and served the harmony of different people groups, but it was also selling out. All the prophets said it: “You’re throwing God under the bus to serve your own interests. Your faith is false, and you have no integrity.” 

The Jewish people ate, drank, and celebrated how great it was to be a wandering, foolish, God-beloved people. As they celebrate, God in the flesh comes to them, offering them the salvation they’ve longed for and prayed for over the centuries—and they say, “Who are  you to disrupt our God’s People Pride celebration?” 

An illustration: So we are finally visited by people from another planet. Among other things, we ask them, “Do you know the Lord? Do you know anything about Jesus?” They say, “Yeah, of course—he visits us regularly--every few years! The last time he came, we gave him a big box of chocolates, which he seemed to like. So tell us, what did you give him last time he was here?” 

All of this translates not against Judaism itself but the Church. We, too, are God’s beloved people—his Elect—and we should wonder if Jesus were to bodily show up in the middle of a service, would we fall and worship him or feel some resentment over the interruption? As with the Feast of Booths, the Church can become prideful and celebrate itself instead of its Lord.

“Attractional” 

The Peril of Relevance

The Church lives in a balancing act between integrity and selling out. We either listen to Christ, or we listen to his brothers who tell us to sell ourselves in order to succeed. We must consider what we lose when we seek to become more “attractive” to outsiders. What is the problem with the so-called attractional church?

Some seem to see the church as a giant spider web designed to lure in visitors and outsiders, hoping that some of them may stick. The so-called Seeker church buries anything and everything unattractive about Christianity that might turn off potential new converts. You know, all that stuff about sex, obedience, and giving your life away. 

But when a church becomes relevant to a world that hates Christ, it sells out. The true Church is sold out for Christ alone; it stands as close to the integrity end of the spectrum as possible: sacrificing all the things of this world: every other club, allegiance, or worldly loyalty. In Luke 14, Jesus says: 

“Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple.”

Christianity and the world mix like oil and water—you can’t have both, and no one can serve two masters. 

The call to faith is a hard sell. It may meet us where we are, but it makes no promises to leave us as we are. On the contrary, to come to Christ is to surrender all and die to self and self-interest. To surrender means that you and I seek to preserve nothing of ourselves or our world—we present ourselves to be unmade and remade—and the pious heart longs and desires to be remade as only Christ may make us. 

Dietrich Bonhoeffer says it well: “When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die.” That is the polar opposite of seeker-friendly and attractional, but that is the real stuff. In coming to Christ, we all make choices to follow him rather than the world that hates him. 

This world is all about pleasing the crowds, seeking popularity and self-promotion, and being liked instead of hated. Jumping ahead a little to John 15: 

 “If the world hates you, be aware that it hated me before it hated you. If you belong to the world, the world loves you as its own. Because you do not belong to the world—for I have chosen you out of the world—the world hates you.” [John 15: 18-19a]

The Church must choose whether it seeks to be loved by the world that hates Christ or loving Christ, be hated by the world. 

Final Judgment

Christ sees the heart of each person

The final word on integrity could have come from Jesus’ brothers. “It’s not what you know; it’s whom you know.” And that is true for salvation. What we know matters far less than whom we know. But even this is problematic, for it’s not our knowing God that matters; it’s God knowing us. 

To say, “I know Jesus” means nothing. Even the demons know Jesus. What matters is that Jesus knows you and me. 

“Not all who cry ‘Lord, Lord’ will enter the kingdom of heaven” [Matthew 7: 21a]

Do you know the Lord? More importantly, does He know you? The Lord judges the heart—he sees the inner truth that the world can never see. Do you really know him? Does he really know you? 

If asked, “Do you know the Lord?” Let our answer be: 

“I don’t know anyone or anything else!” 

And when asked, “Does the Lord know you?” may our answer be: 

 “Yes—like nobody’s business!”


Questions

  1. When is the feast of tabernacles and what was its purpose?
  2. Why did Jesus’ brothers challenge Jesus?
  3. What does Jesus mean by “right time”?
  4. How could the festival crowds have interpreted Jesus’ actions if he had done what his brothers urged him to do?
  5. Why does the world “hate” Jesus?  ( Jesus says “I am the light of the world”..what does light reveal)
  6. What are some of the dark places in our lives that the light of Jesus would reveal?
  7. How are we sometimes deceived into living and acting according to the principles of the world rather than the radically different way that Jesus demonstrates?
  8. Imagine Jesus in our world, how would the world receive him? Consider social media, polarization and lack of trust?
  9. How do you think you would receive Jesus?
  10. What would be the challenges to believing that Jesus is from God?

“The Bread of Life"



   john blank


THE BREAD OF LIFE


Noel K. Anderson

First Presbyterian Church of Upland

Text: John 6: 41-59  New Revised Standard

Elisha & Moses 

Jesus is Moses, the Law, and the Prophets

In the first half of chapter six, Jesus feeds a multitude of five thousand people. You know the miracle—Jesus takes some loaves and a couple of fish and divides them until everyone is well-fed. One of the things this indicates is that Jesus is a prophet among prophets, like Elisha from the text Matt just read. [2 Kings 4: 42-44]. 

You’ll remember that Elisha had a double portion of the spirit of Elijah, who represents all the prophets. So Jesus is, in part, a prophet like Elijah and Elisha. 

But he is also Moses—the new Moses—providing bread for the people of God in the wilderness. Jesus is the new Moses—the bread giver—just as he is the Dionysus, the wine-giver, for turning water into wine in chapter 2. Whatever the Jews of Jesus’ day honored and respected, Jesus himself is a better version of—a more complete fulfillment of God’s promises. 

So Jesus gives the people bread, but pleasing the crowd quickly goes wrong.  Verse 15:

 When Jesus realized that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, he withdrew again to the mountain by himself. 

The people wanted a breadwinner like Moses. They had their bellies fed and they liked it.  Yes, Jesus did feed them—he fed their earthly bodies—but this miracle is not so much a big deal in itself as it is a prelude for what comes after in our text. 

Again, Jesus is not only the bread-giver, but he is the bread itself. He is the bread that came down from heaven, the bread that supplies eternal life. 

bread of heaven

Jesus is more than the bread-giver; he is the bread. He says, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” Of what does this remind them? In part, it should remind them of the bread God provided for Israel in the desert. The people ate manna every day for their daily bread. That bread “from heaven” kept them alive for 40 years. Even so, the people constantly complained—they murmured and grumbled. They grumbled about Moses, they grumbled about God, they grumbled about the manna they ate, and they grumbled about having to live in the desert instead of Egypt, where they were slaves, but well-fed slaves. 

And now, in the synagogue of Capernaum, Jesus says that he, not the manna, is the true bread of heaven. 

elaborations

We rightly understand Matthew, Mark, and Luke through the lens of John. John clarifies the Apostles’ tradition. 

John, as we’ve said, is the clarifier—he brings back the focus as the early gospel spread into the world and began to take on elaboration and, like a ship at sea, barnacles from other cultures. 

We can’t talk enough about the problem of elaboration, because it is our human nature to elaborate. Like the Pharisees elaborated on the Old Testament Law, Christians immediately began elaborating on this new Christianity—adding things in from their own culture—simply because they like them. 

Just as Israel kept going back to idols, people love their own elaborations. How long do you think Moses had been up the hill before the people said, “You know, we ought to make a golden calf—not as an idol, mind you, but just as a place for the Lord to sit.” It took no time. The human tendency toward idolatry is immediate and compelling. 

It happens in a kind of innocence, like children at play: 

“Let’s say that whenever someone lifts the bread, that they face the east because Jesus’ resurrection is like the dawning of a new day.”  

“Oooh, I like that!” 

“And let’s call the guy who lifts the bread a priest, like the priests of the Old Testament, and let’s call the table an altar, just like in the Old Testament, and think of the bread like the animal sacrifice, broken and divided like a heifer.” 

“Yeah—that’s good! We should get some costumes like the Old Testament priests as well—and let’s use the best fabric we can find—put some gold in it.” 

“And let’s get a better cup, and a better table…” and on and on and on. 

The priesthood itself is a failed elaboration. The book of Hebrews makes clear that Jesus Christ is the only and final high priest—the only priest required. If there is to be any priesthood, it is the priesthood of everyone who is in Christ. Everyone is a priest means no one is a priest. 

the worship space

Consider the worship space.  The original Lord’s Supper was in an upper room—what amounts to a dining room. The first Christians gathered for two hundred years at a common table, with a common cup and normal plates—if plates at all—but elaborations turned it into an Old Testament altar.  

After that, the priesthood decided that the riff-raff (you and me) shouldn’t be allowed to come to the altar, so they raised it up and separated it from the mere believers. Only the priests could go up to the altar, because only the priests were holy enough to do so. Today in Orthodox churches there is a railing or wall—the iconostasis wall—keeping the riff-raff out. It’s a toxic elaboration. Catholics had the same practice, but have revised it in the past century. 

In the Mass, the priests, who are holy, turn their backs to the people and lift up the piece of bread at the altar to God. At the moment the magic words are said—hocus corpus—a bell rings, which is the moment the bread turns into the actual flesh and blood of Jesus. After it becomes Jesus, only then, the priest breaks it.  You could say that they have turned Jesus into the sacrificial animal to be sacrificed again and again at every Mass. 

It is all elaboration—all fabrication—with no resemblance to the communion instituted by Christ. 

This sanctuary is designed on the Catholic model. The nave, the sanctuary (priests only), and the raised “altar” are all outside of our Reformed tradition. In America, when Presbyterians built church buildings, they didn’t think theologically—they let the architects build churchy-looking churches. No thought. 

When we gather, we—the priesthood of all believers—we all come up into the sanctuary and gather around the TABLE for the meal Christ provides. It is not a re-sacrificing—it is not a sacrifice at all—though it is a remembrance of Jesus’ once-for-all sacrifice. 

High churches mean to elevate the sacrament. High liturgy is something we invent to express and feel full respect and reverence for God and what he’s given, but we’ve elaborated it out of all sense. What’s worse is that many Christians believe all this stuff and elaboration to be the substance of their faith, which is a pitiable mistake.  The high-liturgy worship traditions are more often than not expressions of the power of the priesthood itself—the power of the priesthood over the people. We reject this on the strongest terms and call all Christians to celebrate the sacrament as it was given by Christ and celebrated by the early Church. 

I have many friends who are Catholic and Orthodox—and I suspect that many of them are better Christians than I—people of great devotion, deep faith, and whom Jesus loves and saves, but I will not hold back from making fun of their clown outfits and gilded barnacles. 

Be clear: the Lord’s supper is necessarily low-church—common, humble—on the bottom shelf. 

Verse 51b:  “Whoever eats of this bread will live forever, and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

That “whoever” is significant. Jesus so often addresses us in the plural, but this means “any individual” or “any single one” is welcome as drawn by the Father. 

Our sacrament takes place at a most-common table for the hungry with a common cup from which anyone may drink. 

sacrament, not symbol

Briefly, the other failed extreme is reducing this sacrament to mere symbolism. Evangelicals have so reacted against high Catholicism and the inordinate elaborations of  Eastern Orthodox traditions that we err on the opposite side, reducing a sacrament to a mere symbol. 

Did Jesus say, “This is my symbol”? Did he say, “This is my bread”?  No. He makes it emphatic and repetitive that “This is my body” and “This is my blood.” Verse 53: 

 “Amen, amen, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.”

The cannibalistic imagery is unavoidable. Jesus doubles and triples down on it, turning the knife in the wound. He holds the puritan’s noses in it. For Jews, it was the ultimate in “unclean”—blood and flesh. It is an intentional offense.  Jesus is saying, “You want to keep eating manna with Moses? Then you are dead already. If you want life, here it is.”  

We don’t get in on our own terms. We must have Jesus—entirely Jesus with nothing else mixed in—or we are dead. Flesh and blood means the total consumption of Jesus and the exclusion of any other spirituality. 

Scripture gives us two sacraments: The Lord’s Supper and Baptism. Catholics and Orthodox Christians long ago elaborated their traditions into seven sacraments—perfect examples of gilding their manmade barnacles with gold and making them the substance of faith. 

But a sacrament is more than a symbol. Traditions are manmade; sacraments are from God.

Sacraments are not something we do for God, but they are signs that God has given to us for our good. We didn’t choose to use bread and wine; Christ chose them. We didn’t make up baptism as a way of initiating people into the Church; Christ gave us baptism for our comfort and assurance of his promises. 

There are centuries’ worth of arguments about how the bread and wine can be or become the flesh and blood of Christ, but these long-winded arguments are all ultimately unsatisfying. We receive a mystery, and all our manmade explanations necessarily fall short. When we come to the table, we do so in simple trust, simple obedience. 

When we come to the table, we receive more than just bread and wine—more than a symbol—we receive the gift of Christ himself. We receive in simple trust his promises. We receive assurance of eternal life. This cannot be manmade, nor can it be improved with gold chalices and lots of liturgy. 

simple trust

Here is your “altar call” in the Church that has no altars. Come to the table. Simply trust in Jesus. Stand on his promises. Repent of your sins and your self-generated righteousness. Receive the mystery of the body and blood, and let’s live this life and eternally by the promises of God made known through our Lord Jesus Christ. 





Questions

  1. What was the context from which Jesus speaks to the rulers in John 5:19-47
  2. In verses 19-23, there appears almost the idea of apprenticeship between Father and Son. What are some of the attributes Jesus declares are given by the Father?
  3. What would it look like if we as Jesus’ followers worked as Jesus did and taught?
  4. In what ways do we see and experience “greater things than these” (signs)? John 14:12
  5. What are the conditions for eternal life and no condemnation? Romans8: 1-4
  6. What does Jesus say about resurrection and how do we know this to be true?
  7. How do followers of Jesus experience the miracle of resurrection before physical death?
  8. How does the understanding of resurrection help us live in a world of death, evil, and injustice?
  9. What can help people to trust the evidence of scripture? That Jesus is Lord?
  10. What can help people to trust the evidence of scripture? Do you have an experience you can share?
                                              © Noel 2021